Peer Review Policy

JANOLI International Journal of Life Sciences follows a rigorous peer-review process designed to ensure the quality, originality, scientific validity, and relevance of published articles.

All submitted manuscripts undergo an initial editorial assessment to determine:

conformity with the journal's scope;

basic scientific and methodological quality;

originality and relevance;

compliance with submission requirements;

ethical compliance;

plagiarism or inappropriate text-reuse concerns; and

suitability for external peer review.

Manuscripts passing the initial editorial assessment are normally evaluated by qualified independent reviewers with appropriate expertise.

The journal may employ a double-anonymized peer-review process, whereby the identities of authors and reviewers are concealed from each other during the review process.

The Editor-in-Chief or designated editor makes the final editorial decision based on the reviewers' assessments, scientific quality, ethical considerations, and editorial judgment.

Possible decisions include:

Accept

Minor Revision

Major Revision

Reject

The journal does not guarantee acceptance or a specific publication time.

Editors may seek additional reviews where reviewer reports conflict substantially or where specialist expertise is required.