Reviewer

Double-Blind Peer Review Policy

All submitted research papers shall undergo a double-blind peer review process.

Online Submission System

Contributors are advised to submit original manuscripts using the online submission system. In case of any difficulty, papers may be submitted via email at mail@janolijournals.org . Authors must ensure that all identifying information is removed from the manuscript.

Review Process

Upon submission, anonymized manuscripts are reviewed by the editorial team for completeness and adherence to journal guidelines. Editors assign manuscripts to reviewers without revealing author identities.

Review and Recommendation

Reviewers provide assessments and recommendations based solely on manuscript content. Recommendations are submitted through secure systems or email, maintaining reviewer anonymity.

Editorial Decision

Editors make final decisions based on reviewer reports. Authors receive reviewer feedback without disclosure of reviewer identities.

Author Revisions

If revisions are required, authors revise manuscripts without knowing reviewer identities.

Editorial Transparency

JANOLI International Journals maintains strict confidentiality of authors and reviewers. Access to identifying information is restricted to the editorial team only.

Publication

Once a manuscript is accepted, author identities are revealed in the final published version.

Ongoing Monitoring

The double-blind review process is continuously monitored to ensure fairness, effectiveness, and integrity.

Reviewer Guidelines

JANOLI International Journals is committed to promoting scientific understanding and maintaining high publication standards. Reviewers play a critical role in ensuring the credibility and quality of published research.

  • Confirm availability to complete reviews within the specified timeframe.
  • Accept or decline review invitations promptly; recommending alternative reviewers is optional.
  • Notify the editorial office if the manuscript is outside your area of expertise.
  • Declare conflicts of interest or time constraints immediately.
  • Maintain objectivity and avoid bias during evaluation.
  • Complete reviews within the assigned timeline.
  • Maintain confidentiality and do not use manuscript content for personal gain.
  • Provide constructive, respectful, and professional feedback.
  • Reviews must not be influenced by race, religion, nationality, gender, or political views.
  • Interested reviewers may apply by submitting their CV and publication details.

Editorial & Reviewer Board

Prof. (Dr.) Abdelmonaim Fakhry Kamel Mohammed
Ain Shams University, Egypt

Prof. (Dr.) Aleksandra Ptak
Czestochowa University of Technology, Poland

Prof. (Dr.) Alok Aggarwal
University of Petroleum and Energy Studies, Dehradun, India

Prof. (Dr.) Aman Sharma
NIET, NIMS University, Jaipur, India

Prof. (Dr.) Anna Dunay
John von Neumann University, Budapest, Hungary

Prof. (Dr.) Andrii Galkin
University of Antwerp, Belgium

Prof. (Dr.) Csaba Bálint Illés
John von Neumann University, Budapest, Hungary

Prof. (Dr.) Dorota Jelonek
Czestochowa University of Technology, Poland

Prof. (Dr.) Ilona Paweloszek
Czestochowa University of Technology, Poland

Prof. (Dr.) Lilla Knop
Silesian University of Technology, Poland

Prof. (Dr.) Rania Nafea
Kingdom University, Bahrain

Prof. (Dr.) Raya Karlibaeva
Tashkent State University of Economics, Uzbekistan

Prof. (Dr.) Virgil Popa
Valahia University of Targoviste, Romania