Reviewer

Double-Blind Peer Review Policy

All submitted research papers shall undergo a double-blind peer review process.

Online Submission System

Contributors are advised to submit their original articles using the online submission link. In case of difficulty, manuscripts may be submitted via email at mail@janolijournals.org. Authors must ensure that their identities are not revealed anywhere in the manuscript.

Review Process

Upon submission, the editorial team reviews anonymized manuscripts for completeness and compliance with journal guidelines. The editor assigns manuscripts to reviewers without disclosing author identities.

Review and Recommendation

Reviewers evaluate the manuscript and submit their assessments and recommendations to the editor through a secure system or via email. Reviewer identities remain confidential.

Editorial Decision

Based on reviewer reports, the editor makes the final decision. Authors receive anonymized feedback from both reviewers and the editor.

Author Revisions

If revisions are required, authors are guided to revise their manuscripts without knowledge of reviewer identities.

Editorial Transparency

JANOLI International Journals maintain strict confidentiality of authors and reviewers. Access to identifying information is restricted to authorized editorial staff only.

Publication

Once a manuscript is accepted, author identities are disclosed in the final published version.

Ongoing Monitoring

The double-blind review process is continuously monitored to ensure fairness, effectiveness, and academic integrity.

Reviewer Guidelines

JANOLI International Journals promote scientific knowledge through a rigorous peer review process. Reviewers play a crucial role in maintaining the quality and credibility of published research.

  • Confirm availability to complete reviews within the specified timeframe.
  • Accept or decline invitations promptly; alternative reviewers may be recommended.
  • Review manuscripts aligned with personal expertise and research interests.
  • Declare conflicts of interest or time constraints immediately.
  • Evaluate manuscripts objectively, avoiding bias or partiality.
  • Complete reviews within the allotted time.
  • Inform the editorial office if the manuscript falls outside the journal scope.
  • Maintain strict confidentiality of manuscript content.
  • Avoid using manuscript information for personal or professional gain.
  • Provide constructive, respectful, and unbiased feedback.
  • Ensure that race, religion, nationality, gender, or institutional affiliation do not influence evaluations.
  • Interested reviewers may submit their CV and publication record to join the reviewer panel.

Editorial & Reviewer Board

Prof. (Dr.) Abdelmonaim Fakhry Kamel Mohammed – Ain Shams University, Egypt
Prof. (Dr.) Aleksandra Ptak – Czestochowa University of Technology, Poland
Prof. (Dr.) Alok Aggarwal – University of Petroleum and Energy Studies, India
Prof. (Dr.) Aman Sharma – NIMS University, Jaipur, India
Prof. (Dr.) Anna Dunay – John von Neumann University, Hungary
Prof. (Dr.) Andrii Galkin – University of Antwerp, Belgium
Prof. (Dr.) Arun Saxena – St. John’s College of Engineering, India
Prof. (Dr.) Dorota Jelonek – Czestochowa University of Technology, Poland
Prof. (Dr.) Helena Fidlerova – Slovak University of Technology, Slovakia
Prof. (Dr.) Ilona Paweloszek – Czestochowa University of Technology, Poland
Prof. (Dr.) Krishna Prajapat – NIMS University, Jaipur, India
Prof. (Dr.) Lilla Knop – Silesian University of Technology, Poland
Prof. (Dr.) Mahesh Joshi – Manipal University Jaipur, India
Prof. (Dr.) Paula Bajdor – Czestochowa University of Technology, Poland
Prof. (Dr.) Tomasz Turek – Czestochowa University of Technology, Poland
Prof. (Dr.) Virgil Popa – Valahia University of Targoviste, Romania