Reviewer

Peer Review Policy

All submitted research papers shall undergo a double-blind peer review process.

Online Submission System

Contributors are advised to submit original articles using the online submission link. In case of any difficulty, manuscripts may be submitted via email at mail@janolijournals.org. Authors must ensure that their identities are not revealed anywhere in the manuscript.

Review Process

Upon submission, the editorial team reviews anonymized manuscripts for completeness and adherence to journal guidelines. Editors assign manuscripts to reviewers without revealing author identities.

Review and Recommendation

Reviewers evaluate manuscripts and submit their assessments and recommendations through a secure system or email. Reviewer identities remain confidential.

Editorial Decision

The editor makes the final decision based on reviewer reports. Authors receive anonymized feedback from reviewers and editors.

Author Revisions

If revisions are required, authors revise manuscripts without knowledge of reviewer identities.

Editorial Transparency

JANOLI International Journals maintain strict confidentiality of authors and reviewers. Access to identifying information is limited to authorized editorial staff only.

Publication

Once a manuscript is accepted, author identities are disclosed in the final published version.

Ongoing Monitoring

The double-blind review process is continuously monitored to ensure fairness, effectiveness, and academic integrity.

Reviewer Guidelines

JANOLI International Journals promote scientific knowledge through a rigorous peer review process. Reviewers play a vital role in maintaining academic quality and credibility.

  • Confirm availability to complete reviews within the specified timeframe.
  • Accept or decline invitations promptly; alternative reviewers may be suggested.
  • Review manuscripts aligned with expertise and research interests.
  • Declare conflicts of interest or time constraints immediately.
  • Evaluate manuscripts objectively and without bias.
  • Complete reviews within the allotted time.
  • Inform the editorial office if the manuscript is outside the journal scope.
  • Maintain strict confidentiality of manuscript content.
  • Avoid using manuscript information for personal or professional gain.
  • Provide constructive, respectful, and unbiased feedback.
  • Ensure evaluations are free from discrimination of any kind.
  • Interested reviewers may submit their CV and publication record.

Editorial & Reviewer Board

Prof. (Dr.) Abdelmonaim Fakhry Kamel Mohammed
Ain Shams University, Egypt
Prof. (Dr.) Aleksandra Ptak
Czestochowa University of Technology, Poland
Prof. (Dr.) Alok Aggarwal
University of Petroleum and Energy Studies, India
Prof. (Dr.) Aman Sharma
NIMS University, Jaipur, India
Prof. (Dr.) Anna Dunay
John von Neumann University, Hungary
Prof. (Dr.) Andrii Galkin
University of Antwerp, Belgium
Prof. (Dr.) Arun Saxena
St John’s College of Engineering and Management, India
Prof. (Dr.) Csaba Bálint Illés
John von Neumann University, Hungary
Prof. (Dr.) Dorota Jelonek
Czestochowa University of Technology, Poland
Prof. (Dr.) Paula Bajdor
Czestochowa University of Technology, Poland
Prof. (Dr.) Tomasz Turek
Czestochowa University of Technology, Poland
Prof. (Dr.) Virgil Popa
Valahia University of Targoviste