Reviewer

All submitted research papers shall undergo a double-blind peer review process.

Online Submission System:

Contributors are advised to submit original manuscripts through the online submission link. In case of difficulty, papers may be submitted via email at mail@janolijournals.org . Authors must ensure that all identifying information is removed from the manuscript.

Review Process:

Submitted anonymized manuscripts are reviewed by the editorial team for completeness and compliance with journal guidelines. Editors assign manuscripts to reviewers without revealing author identities.

Review and Recommendation:

Reviewers submit assessments and recommendations based solely on manuscript quality through a secure system or email, without disclosing their identities to authors.

Editorial Decision:

The editor makes the final decision based on reviewer reports. Authors receive consolidated feedback while reviewer identities remain confidential.

Author Revisions:

When revisions are required, authors revise manuscripts without knowledge of reviewer identities.

Editorial Transparency:

JANOLI International Journals maintains strict confidentiality of authors and reviewers. Access to identifying information is restricted to the editorial team only.

Publication:

Upon acceptance, author identities are revealed in the final published article.

Ongoing Monitoring:

The journal continuously evaluates the effectiveness and fairness of the double-blind review process and makes improvements where required.

Reviewer Guidelines

JANOLI International Journals is committed to maintaining high scientific standards. Reviewers play a crucial role in evaluating manuscripts objectively and ethically.

  • Confirm availability within the specified review timeline.
  • Accept or decline review invitations promptly; alternative reviewer suggestions are optional.
  • Inform the editorial office if the manuscript is outside your expertise.
  • Declare conflicts of interest or time constraints immediately.
  • Maintain objectivity and avoid bias during evaluation.
  • Complete reviews within the given timeframe.
  • Ensure confidentiality and do not use manuscript data for personal gain.
  • Provide constructive, respectful, and non-offensive feedback.
  • Reviews must not be influenced by race, religion, nationality, gender, or political views.
  • Interested reviewers may apply by submitting their CV and publication details.

Editorial & Reviewer Board

Prof. (Dr.) Dorota Jelonek
Czestochowa University of Technology, Poland

Prof. (Dr.) Aleksandra Ptak
Czestochowa University of Technology, Poland

Prof. (Dr.) Alok Aggarwal
University of Petroleum and Energy Studies, Dehradun, India

Prof. (Dr.) Anna Dunay
John von Neumann University, Hungary

Prof. (Dr.) Andrii Galkin
University of Antwerp, Belgium

Prof. (Dr.) Deepa Parasar
Amity University Mumbai, India

Prof. (Dr.) Lilla Knop
Silesian University of Technology, Poland

Prof. (Dr.) Rania Nafea
Kingdom University, Bahrain

Prof. (Dr.) Raya Karlibaeva
Tashkent State University of Economics, Uzbekistan

Prof. (Dr.) Virgil Popa
Valahia University of Targoviste, Romania